A Full Service Employee Benefit and Compliance Solution for Employers

Coronavirus COVID-19 Information & Resources

Keep current on the evolving situtation, regulations, and resources for employers during these unprecidented times.

S4E17 – Recruiting Talent:  Challenges & Opportunities in a Post-COVID World

podcast recruiting challenges post COVID

In this episode, Host Dorothy Cociu shares excerpts from ABC’s January 24th Lunch & Learn program. One of the greatest challenges employers have in our post-pandemic world is recruiting talent and keeping them from moving on quickly to other employers.  In this episode, Kathy Ruffino of Train Me Today and Marilyn Monahan of Monahan Law Office provide us with helpful information and tools for recruiting and retaining quality employees, by providing them with what they are looking for now and in their future.  We cover opportunities for remote work and how to design job descriptions for remote employees at all job tiers, the challenges of hiring a remote or hybrid workforce and how to overcome them, the types of benefits that attract recruits and keep them on the job, and tools to keep employees engaged long-term.  Join us for this informative podcast!

S3E7 – COVID’s Impact on Kids With Autism; The Path Out of the Pandemic

kids with autism during COVID 19

Part 2 of a 2-Part series during Mental Health Awareness Month

Host Dorothy Cociu interviews Ruth Tello-Di Leva, MS, BCBA, on the affects of COVID on kids with Autism. In Part 2 of our 2-part series for Mental Health Awareness Month, we discuss the way external factors, such as a pandemic, affect kids with autism. We dive into the stress, the anxiety, and the little things that make lives better during such unprecedented times. How did these kids deal with the loss of routines and changes during 2020-2021? Have the availability of vaccines and the return to school helped? Ruth also provides helpful tips for parents and kids during these times. Join us for this heart-warming podcast.

Part 2 of a 2 part series.

California COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave – SB 95

By:  Dorothy Cociu, RHU, REBC, GBA, RPA, LPRT, CAHU Vice President, Communications

Published in the May-June, 2021 issue of The STATEMent | Read the article online

SB-95 ariticle in The STATEment magazine by CAHU May-June 2021

In the latest of California state COVID-19 legislation, SB 95 goes into effect 10 days after it was signed on March 19, 2021, and applies retroactively to January 1, 2021 and will remain in place through September 30, 2021.  This legislation provides COVID-19 related supplemental sick leave to those who are unable to work or telework due to COVID-19, and it applies to employers (public and private) with more than 25 employees, and who are unable to work or telework due to a qualifying reason. 

Qualified leave can be granted for the following reasons:

  • The employee is subject to a quarantine or isolation period, defined by the state Department of Health, the CDC, or local health officer (this excludes a general stay-at-home order)
  • The employee has been advised by a health care provider to self-quarantine
  • The employee is attending an appointment to receive a COVID-19 vaccine
  • The employee is experiencing COVID-19 vaccine symptoms that prevent him or her from working or teleworking
  • The employee is experiencing COVID-19 symptoms and is seeking a diagnosis
  • The employee is caring for a family member (as defined by regular sick leave laws) who is subject to a quarantine requirement or self-quarantine as advised by a health care provider
  • The employee is caring for a child whose school or place of care is closed due to COVID-19 on the premises

This supplemental legislation establishes requirements for full-time employees to be entitled to up to 80 hours of paid sick time, and up to 2 weeks for those who are part-time or work variable hours, based on what they would normally have worked over a two-week period (see below). The total number of hours is in addition to hours allowed under Healthy Workplaces and Healthy Families Act of 2014. It basically resets the supplemental sick leave bank that was previously provided under AB 1867 in California and FFCRA, which expired on December 31, 2020.

Variable hour workers are entitled to 14 times the average number of hours the employee worked each day for the employer in the six months preceding the date the employee took COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave.  If the employee worked for their employer for less than six months but more than 14 days, the calculation is based on the entire time the employee worked for the employer. 

SB 95 leave is in addition to any paid sick leave regularly available to the employee.  The employer must provide written notice to employee of the amount of the COVID-19 supplemental sick leave they have available to use.  Similar to AB 1867 and FFCRA, the employer cannot require an employee to use other paid or unpaid leave, including paid time off or vacation time, before or in lieu of using their SB 95 leave. 

For leaves taken on or after January 1, 2021, for which the SB 95 would now apply, the employee must request retroactive payment orally or in writing.  Payment in response to such request is due on or before the payday for the next full pay period after the request was made.

There are specific rules for firefighters.  If a covered employee who is a firefighter was scheduled to work more than 80 hours for the employer in the two weeks prior to the need for leave, the employee is entitled to an amount of COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave equal to the total number of hours the employee was scheduled to work in those two preceding weeks.  They are still subject to the same daily and total aggregate caps of other employees, however. 

Nonexempt employees are paid at the higher of rate of pay (using a formula) or minimum wage; exempt employees are paid in their usual manner for paid leave, with limits of $5,110 in the aggregate, or $511 per day.

Affected California employers must post a notice of the COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave provided under SB 95 in a conspicuous place in the workplace.  If employees do not frequent the workplace, the employer must satisfy the notice requirement through electronic means, such as email. 

Enforcement is tasked to the California Labor Commissioner. 

Like other leave laws, SB-95 includes a notice and paystub requirement. 

The California Department of Industrial Relations released a required poster and provided FAQs, which can be found at:  Poster:  https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/2021-COVID-19-Supplemental-Paid-Sick-Leave.pdf  and FAQs:  https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/COVID19Resources/FAQ-for-SPSL-2021.html .  New toolkit at:  https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/covid-psl/

The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) of 2021 and Related Legislation; A Whirlwind of Funding and Entitlements Throws the Health Insurance Industry Into Turmoil!

A Salute to Those That Made it All Happen!

By: Dorothy Cociu, RHU, REBC, GBA, RPA, President, Advanced Benefit Consulting

 

Published in the May-June, 2021 issue of The STATEMent | Read the article online

Published in the June, 2021 issue of California Broker | Read the article online

The STATEment magazine by CAHU May-June 2021
California Broker magazine published article June 2021

So much has happened in Washington since I last updated you!  Shortly after I wrote the feature article for March-April (“Washington Roundup; Diving Into Federal Updates, Including COVID-19, The New Stimulus Bill (CAA), Agent Disclosure Requirements, and Grandfathered Health Plan Rules”), the DOL/EBSA released Notice 2021-01, which significantly changed the rules for the Outbreak Period, and then a short time later, President Biden signed The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) of 2021, which is a $1.9 Trillion relief package/entitlement program, which, combined, threw the entire health insurance industry into what could have been the most chaotic state of turmoil we’ve seen in decades.

Although there is a lot of stress and chaos to our industry due to these new statutes, I don’t want this article to be a negative one.  Quite frankly, we’ve had enough negativity throughout 2020 and early 2021 with the pandemic.  As vaccine distribution widens and people now have more hope than they have in the past 14 months or so, I want to focus on the new requirements, and the chaos that was dumped on us with little or no notice, but also on those in our industry that stepped up, put on their big-boy (or girl) pants, and dove in to make things happenSo this article is dedicated to the Health Insurance industry… To the carriers, the third party administrators, the general agencies, the benefits attorneys, the benefit consultants, and the related companies that were all, whether we liked it or not, thrown into turmoil, and studied, trained and implemented what was and is needed due to these new laws, and helped the most affected; the insureds, the employers that sponsor health plans, the Medicare recipients, and many more, often times with little or no additional compensation, and with very little sleep these past several months!  This is my salute to all of you!

The Outbreak Period Changes Resulting from Notice 2021-01; How Difficult Is This to Administer?

Let me begin by restating what I reported in the updated version of the above-referenced article (updated March, 2021).  Prior to the release of EBSA Notice 2021-01, we were expecting the “outbreak period” limitation which resulted from COVID-19 legislation, would expire on February 28, 2021.  On February 26, 2021, the DOL/EBSA released Notice 2021-01, which drastically changed the way we track HIPAA Special Enrollment, the 60-day period to elect COBRA, the date for making COBRA premium payments, along with benefit claim determinations.  This Notice allowed the deadlines to be extended based on an individual-by-individual basis….and that each person has their own “tolling period.”  To the average consumer or insured, this is all great news, but to those who have to administer it, this was anything but.  Why is this important and why is this rolling basis difficult to administer?  What are the obstacles?  I asked a few industry representatives and my own company’s benefits attorney, Marilyn Monahan, of Monahan Law Office, to help me explain.

“I suspect the biggest challenges will be implementing the COBRA timeframe extensions, as well as the additional time that participants have to submit health FSA claims,” stated Marilyn Monahan.  “If FSA claims are submitted late, it may be difficult to track and calculate carryovers and forfeitures.  However, employers and TPAs may be able to offset these concerns through communication, such as by encouraging participants to get their claims in as soon as possible so that they are reimbursed as soon as possible.  The extensions in connection with COBRA—coupled with the COBRA subsidies—can create some complex administrative issues.  I also suspect, however, that with the passage of time, it becomes less likely that a qualified beneficiary will request a COBRA effective date that goes back up to one year.”

From an administrator’s perspective, this was not an easy task.  Mary Ann Wessel of EBA&M Corporation, who administers COBRA as well as claims administration, provided these thoughts:  “This is more difficult to administer. We have lost some ability to determine if many participants are still QBs or have found other jobs or have dropped COBRA. It appears to be more difficult to obtain initial information from some employers as to why the participant experienced a termination—probably due to the fact that employers are finding it more difficult to administratively keep good tracking.”

Jeffrey Strong of Sterling Administrators had this to say: “It is a challenge primarily due to each person having their own “tolling periods.”  It is harder to have uniform answers and support.”

Bobbi Kaelin of PayPro Administrators stated:  “Well, where can I start with this one?  I should first indicate that our involvement in this area is the administration of COBRA – so our responsibilities under the notice may be different than other TPAs.  With that said, the individual tolling periods are somewhat challenging, however we’ve been working with our technology partner to utilize the data we already have within our system.  This certainly minimizes the much of the workload, however, it does not eliminate it.”  Related to the tolling periods, Bobbi continued:  “From our perspective, the major obstacle is obtaining/updating/uploading the information on those individuals.  We need accurate Information.  Maybe as far back as 2019. If we have accurate and full information, it’s then a matter of tracking the tolling period based on the individual’s ‘event’ date.”

Is the outbreak period individual tolling periods something that can be solved with IT programming, or since it’s for such a short-term period, is a programming solution even feasible?  What are the options here?  Once again, I asked industry experts for their perspective on this…

MaryAnn Wessel stated: “Wex COBRA System to which we migrated in 2020 does a great job in tracking. We are fortunate in that we chose and implemented this new system in 2020 ahead of this tracking requirement—our prior system would have required much more manual tracking.”

Jeffrey Strong felt that this would be handled differently by most administrators.  “Due to the short time period, manual is how most will handle this.”

From the perspective of Pay Pro Administrators, Bobbi provided these thoughts: “The individual tolling periods should be able to be tracked and managed by updating/programming the administration system/platforms – while utilizing accurate and complete data. I know we’ve been working with our technology partner on every aspect of ARPA & COBRA, as well as our Flex plan administration, preparing and planning for the requirements. If you’re an employer trying to administer and implement these requirements on your own – sheesh, you’ve got your workload cut out for you.”

All in all, the clear message is that this will NOT be easy.  Administrators and employers alike have their hands full with this legislation!

The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 – Summary Overview

The ARPA was a $1.9 Trillion relief package that extends unemployment insurance benefits, provides $1,400 stimulus payments to qualifying Americans; makes several important health-policy-related changes; provides for vaccine distribution and testing to combat COVID-19 pandemic; makes policy adjustments to the Medicaid program; facilitates health insurance coverage and provides more money for healthcare providers, and makes 2 technical Medicare payment changes.  That, of course, if a very brief summary of a massive entitlement package.  I will attempt to break them down for you, focusing on what affects the health insurance industry.

Public Health Funding

In general, the ARPA provides for COVID-19 vaccine distribution, testing and contact tracing; support for healthcare workforce expansion and public health initiatives; $7.5 Billion directed to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to pay for, prepare for, promote, distribute, administer, monitor and track COVID-19 vaccines (see section 2301); allows for $7.66 Billion to state, local and territorial public health departments to hire staff and procure equipment, technology and other supplies to support public health efforts.  In addition, it offers $100 Million for Medical Reserve Corps, $800 Million for National Health Service Corps, $200 Million for Nurse Corps, and $330 Million for teaching health centers that operate graduate medical education, allocates $47.8 Billion to continue the implementation of an evidence-based national COVID-19 testing strategy (HHS funding for COVID-19 testing, contract tracing & mitigation activities) (see section 2401), and directs $1.75 Billion to support genomic sequencing and surveillance initiatives.

Emergency Rural Development Grants for Rural Health Care

Section 1002 provides for a provider relief fund for rural providers (some have called it a provider relief look-a-like fund for rural providers).  These grants are provided through September 30, 2023, and includes $500 Million for Emergency Development Grants for Rural Healthcare, as well as vaccine distribution, medical supplies, reimbursement for revenue loss, telehealth investments, COVID and other testing in rural settings.

Additional Funding

Section 2101 provides for $500 Million in funding for Department of Labor Worker Protection Activities, including OSHA enforcement of high-risk facilities, including meat plants, agriculture, correctional facilities, and others.

In addition, Section 2302 provides for $1 Billion for Vaccine Confidence Activities (ads, importance, etc.), section 2303 provides for $6.05 Billion for enhancements to the supply chain for COVID-19 vaccines, therapeutics and medical supplies, section 2304 provides for $500 Million for COVID-19 vaccine, therapeutic & device activities at the FDA (current & future treatment, approved & licensed), and section 2501 provides $7.6 Billion for public health workforce activities (including cost-wage benefits, recruiting, hiring, training for contact tracing, case support, nurses, etc.).

Funding for Mental Health & Substance Use Disorders (Public Safety & First Responders) & Behavioral Health Provisions at the Local Level

Included in the ARPA are $1.5 Billion in block grants for Community Health Services (section 2701), $1.5 Billion for block grants for prevention and treatment of substance abuse (Section 2702), $80 Million for mental health & substance abuse disorder training for health care professionals, paraprofessionals and public safety officers (section 2703), $20 Million for an education & awareness campaign encouraging healthy work conditions and use of mental health & substance abuse disorder services by health care professionals (section 2704).  There is also $40 Million for grants for health care providers to promote mental health among their health professional workforce (section 2705), and $30 Million for community-based funding for local substance abuse disorder services (section 2706).

The ARPA includes considerable funding at the local level for the behavioral health industry as well.  This includes $30 Million for community-based funding for local behavioral health needs (section 2707), grants to state, local, tribal, and territorial governments, tribal organizations, nonprofit community organizations and primary and behavioral health organizations to address community behavioral needs worsened by COVID-19, as well as grants funded to be used for promoting care coordination among local entities; training the mental and behavioral health workforce, relevant stakeholders, and community members; expanding evidence-based integrated models of care, etc.

There are also provisions for those that work with telehealth, including activities that support, enhance, or expand mental and behavioral health preventive and crisis intervention services.  In addition, there was an additional $10 Million provided for creating/enhancing a national child traumatic stress network (section 2708), and $30 Million for COVID-19 emergency medical supplies enhancements (section 3101).

I am only touching on some of the provisions in the ARPA.  There are many more.  I want to turn now, however, to the most important provisions affecting our industry…

COBRA Premium Assistance (Subsidies) – Section 9501

Before I begin this section, I want to provide a shout-out to my benefits attorney, Marilyn Monahan, of Monahan Law Office, because she and I did a joint webinar for my own clients on all of these provisions in March, and quite honestly, when I was confused on some of the provisions, she was there to assist me in understanding them, so Marilyn, you are much appreciated!  You are, indeed, a benefits industry rock star!  By the time we did our webinar, I was confident I was up to speed on most of the provisions (although I must admit, I still ask her for her assistance from time to time with client questions!).

Under the ARPA, “assistance eligible individuals” (AEIs) are entitled to free COBRA continuation coverage, including the 2% administrative fee, for up to 6 months.  The subsidy begins on April 1, 2021 and ends on September 30, 2021.  We are at this time awaiting additional guidance from the federal Departments of Labor (DOL) and Treasury (IRS), but we were provided Model Notices and some FAQs on April 7, 2021.  These FAQs and Model notices can be found at: https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ebsa/laws-and-regulations/laws/cobra/premium-subsidy.

While we await additional guidance, it’s important to note that some of ARPA’s COBRA subsidy provisions are very similar to the COBRA subsidy provisions included in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA).  Although ARRA did not provide a 100% subsidy, many of the steps and processes appear to be similar.  This has helped industry representatives, particularly carriers and COBRA administrators, in getting a jump on the new but temporary provisions.

“Yes,” stated Marilyn Monahan, “for those provisions in the two bills that are very similar, it is helpful to be able to refer to the 2009 IRS guidance to get an inkling of the direction in which the IRS might go when they issue further guidance on ARPA.”

Jeffrey Strong also felt the steps were similar, and that seems to help the situation.  “Yes it has.  Before it was 65% and this time it is 100%, but we have something to compare to and an idea on how to manage.  The second bite of the apple portion of the law is more of the challenge.”

Bobbi Kaelin responded: “Absolutely!  With ARPA the framework and general understanding of government subsidies is already in place.  Although the subsidies now & multiple notices are different, most systems were updated at the time so it’s a matter of adjusting the dates/datail for ARPA.  Whereas in 2009, we were challenged as everything involved was new: modified platforms, new tracking premium requirements, new notices, education internally and externally – and much more.    In addition to our internal operations, we worked closely with our brokers and employer-clients, explaining the subsidy itself, and the new process we implemented to track and/or collect premiums from two sources, provide notices for the tax credit to the employer, and how to reconcile premiums already paid as the subsidy was enacted.”

So, the previous ARRA legislation does seem to take the sting out of the process.

Who is Eligible (AEI)?

Under the ARPA, “assistance eligible individuals” (AEI) are entitled to free COBRA continuation coverage, including the 2% administration fee, for up to 6 months beginning April 1, 2021 (through Sept. 30, 2021).  AEIs are those whose eligibility for continuation coverage is due to either an involuntary termination of employment (other than gross misconduct), or a reduction in hours that results in the loss of coverage, and it does not need to be COVID-19 related.  This can include individuals who experience a qualifying event (QE) during the subsidy period, prior to the subsidy period currently on COBRA, and who have not exhausted their maximum 18 month of continuation coverage, or individuals who experienced a QE prior to the subsidy period, who did NOT elect COBRA, or allowed their COBRA coverage to lapse, and have not exhausted their maximum 18 months of continuation coverage… meaning they have a new opportunity to enroll and take advantage of the subsidy.  I can imagine that this new enrollment opportunity will cause administrative nightmares for COBRA administrators.  What kind of internal training, tracking, and cost will this have for COBRA administrators?  Is this something that an administrator can absorb, or will it require an increase in COBRA administration costs in general?  “Yes,” replied Jeffrey Strong, “very much so!  There are a lot of moving parts here now and the COBRA administrator market is working to figure this all out.  There is training that is going on as we speak, and as we get more information that is released from the DOL, we are able to refine the tracking and costs needs more.  The big question in the market right now is cost and who is going to absorb it.   I suspect it will cause an increase in costs in general across the administrator realm.”

Bobbi Kaelin provided her perspective as well: “We have benefitted by our experience under ARRA, so at least we’re not ‘starting from scratch’ in many ways.  However, there is certainly an increase in the workload itself in a variety of areas.  Internally we’ve spent additional time training and educating our teams; reconciling information that may have been inaccurately reported or not reported at all, updating the system for each client for new/multiple notices for each scenario, and updated our premium payment processes.  In all, our workload has increased tremendously.  In addition, there are ‘hard costs’ involved such as the preparation, printing, tracking and mailing/remailing costs for every single individual it pertains to.”

Bobbi continued: “I do not believe that this is something any administrator can absorb.  At PayPro Administrators, we’re not increasing our general COBRA admin fees. Instead, we will implement temporary and nominal fees in place for the new/modified notices that need to be re-sent/provided.  For any ‘new events’ that occur after April, the newest notices are already in place and there are no additional fees. Phew!

For new clients, there will be a temporary fee for those new notices that need to be re-sent and we will require more detailed and accurate information than they are likely used to. For those brand-new COBRA events and their associated notices, we do not anticipate any additional fees. “

MaryAnn Wessel stated:  “We have no plans right now to increase our fees, but we always monitor costs by Department.”  So, we’ll see how all of this plays out over time.

It’s important to note, however, that someone who terminates employment VOLUNTARILY is not a qualified AEI under the ARPA COBRA Premium Assistance provisions.

Extended Election Period

It’s important to understand that individuals who experienced a QE prior to the subsidy period, whose maximum period of COBRA coverage has not yet ended, and who either did not elect COBRA or allowed their COBRA coverage to lapse, have a NEW OPPORTUNITY to elect COBRA and take advantage of the subsidy.  In these situations, the COBRA coverage is prospective; it does not begin before April 1, 2021, and it will not extend beyond the length of their maximum coverage period had they elected COBRA when originally eligible.  Under these circumstances, the administrator must provide a revised COBRA election notice within 60 days of April 1 (or by May 31) and AEIs will have 60 days to elect COBRA after they receive the notice.

This is much easier to understand with examples, so I will provide some.  These examples were taken from the statute, and modified for easier understanding my Marilyn Monahan (so thanks again, Marilyn!).

COBRA SUBSIDIES – SCENARIOS

Let’s assume that Alpha Corp is located in Pasadena, CA.  In 2020, Alpha had 50 employees, so therefore they are subject to Federal COBRA (over 20 employees).  Alpha Corp offers full-time employees a fully insured health plan.  During 2020, Taylor works full-time for Alpha as a bookkeeper.  Taylor elected her company’s health plan and was covered by that plan.  In November, 2020, let’s look at some sample scenarios:

  • Taylor quits. She is offered COBRA, elects COBRA, and is currently on COBRA. Is she eligible for the COBRA Premium Subsidy provided by ARPA?  No, because she is not an AEI as she voluntarily terminated.
  • Taylor is terminated for cause. Taylor is offered COBRA, elects COBRA, and is currently out on COBRA.  In this scenario, Taylor is considered an AEI, and eligible for a subsidy beginning April 1, 2021, through September 30, 2021.
  • Taylor is terminated for cause. She is offered COBRA, elected COBRA, and then let her COBRA coverage lapse at the end of January, 2021.  Taylor must be provided a new COBRA Election Form, and be given the opportunity to elect COBRA again.  If she elects COBRA again, effective April 1, 2021, COBRA premiums will be subsidized, through September, 2021.
  • Taylor is laid off because Alpha’s business is down due to COVID-19. Taylor is offered COBRA but did not elect COBRA. She will now be given a new opportunity to enroll prospectively.  Effective April 1, 2021, the premiums will be subsidized through September, 2021.

 

Who is Not Eligible for the Subsidy?

An AEI is not eligible for the subsidy as of the first date that the individual is eligible for coverage under any other group health plan (other than coverage consisting only of excepted benefits, coverage under a health FSA, or coverage under a QSEHRA) or Medicare.  If an AEI becomes ineligible for the subsidy because the AEI becomes eligible for other coverage or Medicare, the AEI must notify the group health plan.  Failure to provide the notice to the group health plan could subject the AEI to an IRS penalty.

Types of Coverage Eligible for Premium Subsidy

All group health plans subject to COBRA (under ERISA, IRC, or Public Health Service Act (PHSA)), or coverage “under a State program that provides comparable continuation coverage” (in other words, “comparable” state mini-COBRA laws), are eligible for the premium subsidy.  This includes (we assume at this point, but are awaiting guidance) state and local government plans subject to the Public Health Services Act (PHSA).  We assume at this time that this will include dental, vision, and HRAs, as these were allowed during the ARRA subsidy starting in 2009.  Premium subsidy eligible plans do not include a health flexible spending arrangement.  This was spelled out in the statute.

One question that will likely come up is does the subsidy apply to Cal-COBRA or other state mini-COBRA laws?  At this time, we assume that it applies to employers with 2-19 employees, but we are awaiting further guidance.

The ARPA, simply stated, says that continuation coverage provided “under a State program that provides comparable continuation coverage” to COBRA will also be eligible for the subsidy, although we need a definition of “comparable,” which we assume will be covered in guidance.  Given what has been provided to us to date, we assume that certain state mini-COBRA laws (such as Cal-COBRA for those working for employers with 2-19 employees) should be eligible for the premium subsidy.  Similar language was included in ARRA in 2009 regarding subsidies, but again, we are awaiting guidance.

When can the subsidy end early?  Under the ARPA, coverage is generally good for up to 6 months, April 1, 2021 through Sept. 30, 2021.  However, the subsidy can end early if the AEI’s 18-month continuation coverage period ends prior to that date, or if the AEI becomes eligible for coverage under another group health plan (other than coverage that is only excepted benefits, a health FSA, or a QSEHRA) or Medicare.

Premium Payment Responsibility & Tax Credits

If the AEI does not pay the COBRA premium, who is responsible for payment?  In a multiemployer plan, the plan is responsible.  In a plan that is either subject to COBRA under ERISA, the IRC, or the PHSA, or is self-funded, the employer.  If one of these circumstances does not apply, such as a fully insured group plan that is subject to state continuation coverage laws, the insurer.  We assume this will be the case with mini-COBRA participants as well as church plans, but again, we are awaiting further guidance.  

Basically, in a fully insured arrangement, the employer cuts the premium check to the insurance carrier (the same as they would an active employee and dependents), but later gets a tax credit.  In a self-funded plan, the employer will not receive the check from the COBRA participant, but will continue to pay the COBRA premiums.  Self-funded employers, too, will receive a tax credit to reimburse them for the cost of COBRA coverage.

The employer, insurer, or plan is entitled to reimbursement of the premium in the form of a federal tax credit against certain quarterly payroll taxes for the reimbursement of the COBRA premiums.  These payroll tax credits are generally in the form of Medicare taxes.  If the credit, however, exceeds the payroll tax liability, a refund will be available.  You should be aware, however, that there are restrictions on “double-dipping”; ie if the employer is receiving a tax credit for qualified health plan expenses because the employer is providing paid leave under the FFCRA (which is of course voluntary, as the FFCRA mandates ended on December 31, 2020, but the CAA allowed for an employer to voluntarily continue providing paid leave into 2021), the employer cannot also take this tax credit.  It is advisable that you advise your employer clients to seek the advice of their tax and/or legal counsel regarding these circumstances before they take tax credits, to be sure they are complying with the provisions of each of these laws.  The “how to” do this “mechanics” should be forthcoming in guidance.

Reimbursement to AEIs if Paid During Subsidy Period

Let’s say that the AEI goes ahead and pays the premium during this 6-month subsidy period, even though it should have been subsidized.  The statute states that the employer, insurer or plan must reimburse the AEI within 60 days.  Is this tracking of who pays or does not pay a responsibility of the employer/plan sponsor or the contracted COBRA administrator? I felt this would be best answered by an attorney, so I asked Marilyn to explain:  “When the employer sends out the revised COBRA notices, the employer should attach another model form issued by the DOL—the ‘Summary of the COBRA Premium Assistance Provisions under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021.’  The Summary includes a form an AEI can fill out to notify the employer that the individual believes they are eligible for the subsidy.  According to the DOL’s FAQs, ‘Accordingly, plans and issuers should not collect premium payments from Assistance Eligible Individuals and subsequently require them to seek reimbursement of the premiums for periods of coverage beginning on or after April 1, 2021, and preceding the date on which an employer sends an election notice, if an individual has made an appropriate request for such treatment.’  It would also be appropriate for the employer to identify—and track—those who are eligible for the subsidy and refund payments when appropriate.”

Bobbi Kaelin provided her perspective… “Ultimately, it’s the responsibility of the employer/plan sponsor.  However, here at PayPro Administrators, we will work with the plan sponsor to track/report premiums that we have received and remitted to either the carriers directly, or to the plan sponsor.  The responsibility for reimbursing the AEI, at this point, will be determined between the carrier, plan sponsor, and the Administrator (if the administrator collects the entire premiums and remits it directly to the carrier under a separate COBRA invoice).”

 New Notice Requirements

There are several new notice requirements for COBRA under the ARPA.  In general, new notice requirements include the following:

  • Modify existing COBRA election notice to send to those who have a qualifying event on or after April 1, 2021 to inform them that they are eligible for a premium subsidy
  • Modify existing COBRA election notice to send to those who already have ha a qualifying event but are now entitled to an extended election period (this must be sent by May 31, 2021)
  • Modify existing COBRA election notice to notify AEIs of the Plan Enrollment Option, if the employer offers this (more information on this to follow)
  • Create a new notice to inform those whose subsidy is ending between 45 and 15 days of the end of the subsidy (so approximately between August 15 – September 15 , 2021 if the subsidy is ending on September 30, 2021)

New Model Notices were released on April 7, 2021 and can be found at:  https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ebsa/laws-and-regulations/laws/cobra/premium-subsidy.  They are available in pdf or word formats.  The FAQs can be found at:  https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/EBSA/about-ebsa/our-activities/resource-center/faqs/cobra-premium-assistance-under-arp.pdf.

What must employer plan sponsors and/or COBRA administrators be prepared to do before these notices can go out?  “They will need to figure out a delivery mechanism, electronic, mail…etc.  Then they need to figure out who needs to get the notices,” stated Jeffrey Strong.

Bobbi Kaelin also commented.  “First communicate with your TPA. You’ll want to make sure your TPA is responsible for sending on the notices on behalf of the plan sponsor.  The TPA may request that you review or update information in order to provide the notices to applicable individuals.  Additional information may be requested by the TPA as well.  Confirm or inform your TPA if you wish to allow eligible individuals to enroll in a less expensive plan.”

“Additionally,” stated Bobbi, “for both plan sponsors and TPAs, be prepared to receive questions from sponsors, employees, beneficiaries and those that question why they are not receiving a notice of COBRA coverage at no cost.  Plan sponsors and TPAs need to be patient – this is new and quite cumbersome.  And eventually more notices will need to be sent out indicating the subsidy has expired.  But before those notices are event prepared – be patient – everything may change again! Under the ARRA in 2009, the original subsidy period was extended from 9 months to 18 months – without much advance notice. The same could occur with ARPA.”  Of course, we are all very familiar with that possibility, as it seems to be happening a lot lately!

Is this an additional cost for administrators to absorb and is this something that you feel most COBRA administrators will have to charge additional fees for? “This is the $10,000 question, and currently we do not have much information here; we are getting information updates about every couple of days,” commented Jeffrey Strong.  “As well as for costs, the COBRA administrator market is reviewing the capital needs to meet the notice requirements and is figuring out what it is, and who will pay.  So more to come here.”

Certain tasks, functions or services might be absorbed, however there are certain costs that most TPAs shouldn’t be expected to absorb,” replied Bobbi Kaelin.   “I would assume that most TPAs would absorb the costs for system upgrades and IT programming, however, hard costs such as re-mailing notices and then additional notices, will likely be passed on to the plan sponsor. At PayPro Administrators, we do not intend to have any additional fees beyond the newly required temporary notice mailings.”

These are important questions to ask your administrators now, not later… Inquire about costs and budget appropriately. 

Employers should start working with their internal HR departments and COBRA administrators to start preparing for the distribution of the new notices, etc.  There will also be tracking to do for anyone on COBRA since November, 2019 (going back 18 months), to give another opportunity to enroll, add back on, receive subsidies, etc.  So the work is far from over!

Notices Scenarios

I’ll provide a couple of scenarios, taken from the statute, but again modified slightly and expanded upon by our benefits attorney, Marilyn Monahan, to try to simplify the notice requirements, as it’s often easier to understand with examples.

Example One:

Anna was terminated for cause and her COBRA coverage would have started on November 1, 2019, but Anna did not elect COBRA.  Because Anna has not yet exhausted her 18 months of COBRA coverage, she must be offered the opportunity to enroll effective April 1, 2021, and receive 1 month of subsidized COBRA coverage (as the 18 months would expire on April 30, 2021, with an effective date of November 1, 2019), assuming she is not eligible for other group coverage or Medicare.  Anna would receive an updated COBRA election (general) notice, and she would also receive a notice that the subsidy will end on April 30, 2021.

So, in essence, again, the latest you have to go back is to November, 2019, to cover the 18 month COBRA period for anyone.  So, employers need to look at all terminations from November, 2019 to present, to offer new opportunities to enroll, etc.

Example Two: 

Andy was terminated for cause and his COBRA coverage would have started on January 1, 2020, but Andy did not elect COBRA.  Because Andy has not yet exhausted his 18 months of COBRA coverage, he must be offered the opportunity to enroll effective April 1, 2021, and receive 3 months of subsidized COBRA coverage (as the 18 months would expire on June 30, 2021, with an effective date of January 1, 2020), assuming he is not eligible for other group coverage or Medicare.  Andy would receive an updated COBRA election (general) notice, and he would also receive a notice that the subsidy will end on June 30, 2021.

Example Three:

Derek reduced hours worked starting on January 1, 2021, for personal reasons.  This results in a loss of coverage effective January 1, 2021, which is a COBRA qualifying event.  Derek elects COBRA.  Effective April 1, 2021, Derek is entitled to 6 months of subsidized coverage as long as he’s not eligible for another group health plan or Medicare.  Derek will receive an updated COBRA election notice explaining the subsidy.

In this example, it’s important to note that a reduction in hours does not have to be involuntary.  Even voluntary reduction in hours could be subsidy-eligible, unless further guidance disallows that. 

Now, if you assume instead that Derek’s COBRA Qualifying Event takes effect April 1, 2021, the same result will occur as above; 6 months of subsidized COBRA premiums.

Let’s say however that before receiving a new COBRA notice, Derek pays for the April premium for fully insured coverage.  If this is the case, the employer would be required to reimburse the COBRA premium back to Derek within 60 days.

Now let’s assume that Derek’s open enrollment date was January 1, 2021.  Derek pays the January premium, then stops paying premiums.  Under ARPA, Derek will be given an updated COBRA election notice, and he can re-start COBRA with an effective date of April 1, 2021, and it will be subsidized for 6 months.  Under the Outbreak Period rules (covered earlier in this article), Derek has up to one year to pay for February and March, 2021 premiums, if Derek wants coverage in those months.  But let’s say he had no claims…  He elects COBRA coverage effective April 1, so there is a gap in coverage… Starting on April 1 he gets a subsidy for 6 months, so if he had no claims in February or March, he could simply not pay those back premiums, and let the effective date be April 1, 2021.  So, I’m sure you picked up on this right away… The outbreak period changes plus the subsidy rules under ARPA allows for adverse selection, so that COBRA beneficiaries can elect to have coverage in the months in which they have claims and/or have subsidized coverage, and skip payment in the months of February and March, in this scenario, if there were no claims during those months (assuming new guidance doesn’t change that).

Indeed, the Registered Health Underwriter (RHU) and former TPA executive in me gets a bit cross-eyed when I work through these scenarios!

Scenario – Timeframe Extensions and COBRA Subsidies

Here is another example to help you to understand the timeframe extensions and COBRA subsidies.

Tim was involuntarily terminated effective November 30, 2020.  His health coverage also ended 11/30/20.  He was offered COBRA and under typical COBRA rules, Tim has 60 days to elect COBRA.  Tim did not elect COBRA.  Tim is not currently eligible for another group plan or Medicare.  Under the timeframe extensions, Tim will have until January 30, 2022 to elect COBRA.  Under the ARPA COBRA subsidies, Tim must be provided a new COBRA election notice explaining the COBRA subsidies and the extended election period.  He will have 60 days from that notice to elect COBRA, effective April 1, 2021.  Tim’s maximum period of COBRA coverage is 18 months, or through May 31, 2022.

This means that there will be a gap in coverage unless Tim goes back and pay the COBRA premiums, which he has one year to do.  He will still be eligible for subsidized coverage for the period April 1, 2021 through September 30, 2021.

Confused yet?

Plan Enrollment Option – Optional

Employers may, but are not required, to offer the AEIs the opportunity to change their coverage from the plan they are currently enrolled in to another one offered by the employer.  In such case, the cost of the coverage in the alternative plan cannot exceed the cost of the current plan the AEI is enrolled in, and the coverage must be offered to similarly-situated, active employees.

The alternative coverage cannot be only excepted benefits, a QSEHRA, or a health FSA.  The employer must provide the notice, and the information about the option should be included in the updated COBRA election notices.  AEIs then have 90 days to elect the coverage change.

This option would work in scenarios where for example, someone wants to change from a PPO to an HMO if there are better benefits, for example, within the HMO.  To do this, the plans must cost the same or less than the one they are covered in.

Are There Potential Penalties?

There was not much guidance in ARPA related to penalties, however we have pre-existing penalties for COBRA under ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code (IRC).  Under these pre-existing rules, failure to comply could result in ineligibility for tax credits, a per day penalty for failure to provide a COBRA notices under ERISA (does not apply to government employers), and a per day excise tax under the IRC for failure to comply with COBRA.  In addition, failure to comply can result in participant complaints potentially followed by lawsuits under ERISA or PHSA, as well as potential audits by the DOL or IRS.

If a plan participant fails to notify the group health plan of ineligibility for a subsidy, it could result in an IRS penalty of $250 or 110% of the subsidy if it was deemed intentional.

Marketplace Advanced Premium Tax Credit (Section 9661)

Another important change under the ARPA is additional funding for marketplace advanced premium tax credits, or APTC.  Under the ACA, if you purchase an individual health policy from a Marketplace (such as Covered California or the federal marketplace), you may be eligible for a premium tax credit to help pay for the cost of that coverage, depending on your household income.

For 2021 and 2022, the ARPA is expanding eligibility for those tax credits.  CMS announced additional credits available in the federal marketplace starting April 1, 2021 (check with your state’s marketplace to determine effective dates).

In general, the additional subsidies in the Marketplace will be based on the percentage of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL).

Premiums for consumers after these new savings will decrease, on average, by $50 per person per month, or $85 per policy per month.  It is reported that four out of five enrollees will be able to find a plan for $10 or less per month after premium tax credits, and over 50% will be able to find a Silver Plan for $10 or less per month. No one will pay more than 8.5% of their household income towards the cost of a benchmark plan, or a less expensive plan.

Covered California, for example, in a press release dated March 18, 2021, stated that an estimated 3 million Californians are among the 25 million Americans who stand to benefit from the new and expanded subsidies, which will lower premium costs and make health care coverage more affordable than ever.  According to this press release, Covered California will open a new special enrollment period on April 12, for May 1 coverage for the estimated 1.2 million uninsured Californians who are eligible, as well as the 430,000 people current insured off-exchange who will qualify for the new financial help.  In addition, says the press release, most of Covered California’s currently enrolled consumers will see an average of $119 per household in monthly premium savings that will automatically start in May. 

Covered California, as well as other Marketplaces, have a major marketing campaign to get more people covered during this special period.

According to Covered California, consumers who earn less than $32,000 a year for an individual will be able to either get a benchmark Silver plan for between $50 and $60 per month and virtually would be able to get a Bronze plan for $1 per month.  People currently insured off-exchange will now be eligible for subsidies within the exchange. No one will pay more than 8.5% of their income on health premiums.  An individual with income $51k+ per year currently pays (on Covered California plans) an average of $1,100/month for coverage.  Under expanded subsidies with ARPA, their monthly premium drops to an average of $508 – a savings of nearly $600/month, and a total of nearly $12,000 between this May and the end of 2022.

State Small Business Credit Initiative (Section 3301)

The ARPA added $10 billion for additional assistance for small business, including $1.5 billion for socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, and $500 million to very small businesses with fewer than 10 employees, which may include independent contractors and sole proprietors.

PPP Modifications (Section 5501)

An additional $7.25 Billion has been provided for new funds for PPP Programs, which opens up additional funding  for new groups, including eligibility of certain non-profit entities for coverage loans.

Support for Restaurants (Section 5003)

The ARPA provided for a new “Restaurant Revitalization Fund.”  Under this funding, the SBA will administer grants to be awarded on or after 60 days of enactment of the ARPA.  It provides for $28.6 Billion in grants, which will include $5 Billion for entities with gross receipts during 20219 or not more than $500,000, and $23.6 Billion for eligible entities of different sizes based on annual gross receipts.

The Covered Period is between February 15, 2020 and December 31, 2021.  An eligible entity includes a restaurant, food stand, food truck, food cart, caterer, saloon, inn, tavern, bar, lounge, brewpub, tasting room, or taproom.  It does specify that entities with more than 20 locations are NOT ELIGIBLE (whether or not those locations do business under the same or multiple names), and that publicly traded companies are NOT ELIGIBLE.

During the first 21 days, priority will be given to small business owned and controlled by women, veterans, or socially and economically disadvantaged small business concerns.

Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (Section 9011)

The ARPA provides for extensions of previous provisions related to unemployment, including individuals who are self-employed, seeking part-time employment, or who otherwise would not qualify for regular unemployment compensation.  It expires Sept 6, 2021, and increases the number of eligible weeks from 50 to 79 weeks in many cases.  For all others, it allows for 24 weeks to 53 weeks at $300 per week.

Included in the unemployment assistance is unemployment for a state with no waiting period and the suspension of tax on a portion of unemployment compensation for taxable years beginning in 2020.

The first $10,200 in unemployment benefits will not be included in gross income for taxpayer with gross income less than $150,000.

Dependent FSAs (Section 9632)

For the 2021 tax year, the amount that can be contributed to an employer-sponsored dependent care assistance program (aka a DCAP or dependent care FSA) is increased from $5,000 to $10,500, or $5,250 if married and filing separately. This provision may be adopted retroactively to 1/1/2021, so long as a written cafeteria plan amendment is adopted no later than the last day of the plan year, and the plan is administered according to the change in the interim.

If a plan sponsor decides to take advantage of the DCAP provision increases, what are the requirements for the plan sponsor if they want to do this (ie plan amendment)?  “An employer that wishes to increase the contribution limits for its DCAP will undoubtedly have to amend the terms of its written cafeteria plan document,” stated Marilyn Monahan.  “The amendment must be adopted no later than the last day of the plan year to which the amendment is effective and, in the interim, the employer must administer the plan consistent with the amendment. Any such changes should also be communicated to employees.”

Tax Credit for Paid Sick Leave (Section 3131)

Under the ARPA provisions, employers may be eligible for a 100% credit for qualified sick leave wages.  Employers are NOT required to provide the leave, but if they do, they can continue to receive tax credits for the period April 1, 2021 through September 30, 2021.  Paid leave benefits of up to $200 are available for reasons (from prior FFCRA class and article) 4, 5, 6 or newly added reasons for leaves, and up to $511 for reasons 1, 2 or 3 of the FFCRA provisions.  There is, however, a limit of 10 days for the leaves.

Remember that there was a hard stop for FFCRA benefits on December 31, 2020, but a voluntary extension was then available through March 31, 2021.  If employers elected this voluntary extension, they are now entitled to these additional tax credits.

Tax Credit for Paid Family Leave (Section 3132)

For paid family leave, credit is now available under the ARPA for 100% credit, for time period April 1, 2021 through September 30, 2021, for up to $200 with no more than $12,000 across all quarters (up from $10,000).  These tax credits apply to all eligible reasons under FFCRA.

Leave Rules

Under these leave rules, credit can be claimed on the employer’s quarterly taxes, and excesses are refundable, or employers may claim advance credit and can include qualified health plan expenses.  All of the same administrative rules from FFCRA apply as to eligible employees and available hours under these provisions.  Governmental entities, however, are not eligible to claim this credit.

Credits cannot be applied if an employer is claiming under the PPP Loans, Restaurant Revitalization Grants or Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Non-Profit Organizations, and Venues Act Grants. As stated above, there is no double-dipping allowed….

Conclusion – This Article is Dedicated to The Industry

In conclusion, I’m pretty sure that your heads are spinning right now and that you probably had to set this article down a few times before you continued.  So, I ask you… How do you think this has been for the administrators and industry personnel dealing with all of this?  So for all of you, again, this article is dedicated to you, and to all of the hard work you put into all of these new laws.  Our hats are off to you!  THANK YOU!!!!

##

Author’s Note:  I’d like to once again thank Marilyn Monahan of Monahan Law Office for her assistance with this article and my previous client webinars on this topic.  I’d also like to thank MaryAnn Wessel, Jeffrey Strong and Bobbi Kaelin for their assistance and cooperation with this article. 

Disclaimer:  The information provided in this article does not constitute legal or tax advice.  This article only provides a summary of certain complex and always evolving laws and regulations.  Readers should consult their legal counsel for guidance on the application and implementation of the many federal and state laws that impact employee benefit plans and the workplace, including the topics discussed in this article.

Reference Sources:  Bill Text, HR 1319, Webinar Materials, The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 and Outbreak Period Updates, March 30, 2021, by Dorothy Cociu and Marilyn Monahan (Monahan Law Office).

Special Edition Podcast – American Rescue Plan Act 2021 and Legislative Updates Spring 2021

American Recovery Plan Act 2021 podcast

The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) 2021 and Other Legislative Updates – Spring, 2021 – A Special Off-Season Release!

Host Dorothy Cociu and Guest Marilyn Monahan of Monahan Law Office discuss the details of the $1.9 trillion relief package called the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) 2021, as well as the changes to the Outbreak Period, which threw the health insurance industry into turmoil. Dorothy and Marilyn discuss the outbreak period and timeframe extensions from DOL/EBSA Relief Notice 2021-01, and dive into the details of the ARPA. They will update you on the overview of the relief package, and attempt to provide clarifications to the complicated COBRA premium assistance/subsidy rules and tax credits. In addition, they will discuss the Marketplace Advance Premium Tax Credit increases, small business tax credit, PPP modifications, support for restaurants, unemployment assistance, dependent FSA provisions, and updates to the paid family leave/paid sick leave provisions. Lastly, Marilyn will update you on California’s SB 95, a supplemental paid sick leave law. Show notes are provided to assist you with these complicated provisions.

Washington Roundup; Diving Into Federal Updates, Including COVID-19, The New Stimulus Bill (CAA), Agent Disclosure Requirements, and Grandfathered Health Plan Rules

Updated article on March 19, 2021 with the most recent national actions.
Published in the March-April, 2021 issue of The STATEMent | Read the article online
Published in the April 2021 issue of California Broker magazineRead the article online

The STATEment March April 2021
California Broker April 2021

There has been so much going on in Washington that it’s definitely hard to keep up. Just after I finish writing a ten-to-twelve page article on something important, more of course happens, meaning that more lengthy articles are waiting to be written… 2020 and now 2021 have definitely kept us all busy!

COVID-19 Updates & Reminders

I want to start with some COVID-19 updates. I know I have previously written articles on COVID-19 Legislation Part 1 and COVD-19 Legislation Part 2 on this topic, but I do think there are some updates you might be interested in.

As a reminder, there are some important deadlines from previous COVID-19 legislation (pre-CAA). Paid leave under the FFCRA expired on December 31, 2020. This was a hard stop. In California, AB 1867, which had many of the same provisions of FFCRA but applied to groups with over 500 employees (FFCRA applied to groups with fewer than 500 employees), also ended on December 31, 2020, although if someone were in the middle of a leave on December 31, that leave could continue until completed. Keep in mind, the California AB 1867 did not have tax credit provisions. For paid leave under FFCRA, employers are reminded to disclose in box 14 of the W-2 form, the amount of qualified wages paid under FFCRA. The IRS has updated its FAQs and items 25, 25a and 31-36 focus on the tax credit provisions of FFCRA.

Under the CARES Act, over-the-counter medicines used for medical care, as well as menstrual products, may be reimbursed by an HSA, health FSA, HRA, or Archer MSA, and applies to expenses incurred and amounts paid as of January 1, 2020. You should be sure to have plan amendments in place and coordinate with your TPA. Mid-year cafeteria plan election changes implemented during the 2020 calendar year require a plan amendment by December 31, 2021. In addition, Health FSA carryover provisions were increased to $550, and also require a plan amendment by December 31, 2021.

In addition, the mandate to provide COVID testing without cost sharing was recently extended another 90 days, so it now expires on April 21, 2021, unless further extended. This was part of the HHS Public Health Emergency.

COVID-19 Vaccines are required under Section 3203 of the CARES Act for non-grandfathered group and individual health plans, and the cost of a coronavirus vaccine must be with no cost-sharing 15 business days after the vaccine is recommended as preventive care. Grandfathered plans and excepted benefits are not subject to this mandate but may voluntarily comply. In addition, during the Public Health Emergency (now through April 21, 2021 but subject to potential additional extensions), vaccines must be provided without cost-sharing, whether they are provided by an in-network or out-of-network provider, including multi-dose vaccines and the cost of administering the vaccine. Reimbursements for out-of-network providers must be made at a “reasonable rate.” You should also review, of course, OSHA, EEOC and state guidance on vaccines and workplace issues related to COVID-19.

As a reminder, under the FFCRA and CARES Act, during the HHS Public Health Emergency, all group and individual health plans, including fully-insured, self-funded grandfathered or non-grandfathered plans, must cover testing (not treatment) for the detection or diagnosis of COVID-19, and related items and services, such as in-person visits, telehealth, urgent care and ER visits without cost sharing (no co-pays or deductibles), and they cannot require prior authorization or medical management. Tests that must be covered include at-home testing, multiple COVID tests, and antibody tests. Testing for employment purposes, however, is not covered. Therefore, if an employer requires a COVID-19 test before you return to work, those tests are not required to be covered at no-cost under the FFCRA and CARES Act, so you could be billed for those services. It is best to coordinate with your employer to determine who will pay for required COVID tests to return to work.

Timeframe Extensions (for plan participants, beneficiaries, or claimants) The Outbreak Period End Date  (NOTE:  INFORMATION IN THIS SECTION CHANGED DRASTICALLY WITH THE RELEASE OF DOL NOTICE 2021-01 ON FEBRUARY 26, 2021.  THIS ARTICLE WAS UPDATED IN MARCH TO PROVIDED UPDATED INFORMATION RELATED TO THE CHANGES FROM THIS NOTICE).

If you’ll recall, timeframe extensions were granted in 2020, which stated that for plan participants, beneficiaries or claimants, the Outbreak Period, beginning March 1, 2020, was disregarded in

connection with the period to request HIPAA Special Enrollment, the 60-day election period for COBRA Coverage, the date for making COBRA premium payments, the 60-day period for individuals to notify the plan of a COBRA-qualifying event or determination of disability, the date to file a benefit claim, the date to file an adverse benefit determination, the date for a claimant to file a request for an external review after the receipt of an adverse benefit determination or final adverse benefit determination, or the date for a claimant to file information to file a request for external review upon finding that the request was not complete.

 

To keep you up to date, after I wrote this article in mid-February, very important information was released by the Department of Labor in EBSA Disaster Relief Notice 2021-01.  So that you understand the original information plus the update, I am going to attempt to frame this with “THEN and NOW” information, to be sure that you’re not confused (at least as much as possible) with conflicting information that is out there.  Of course, it’s confusing… it all changed with one notice release! 

As discussed in my original article, there had been little chatter of this, but according to ERISA sections 518 and Code Section 7508A, the Secretary may, notwithstanding any other provision of law, prescribe, by notice or otherwise, a period of up to 1 year which must be disregarded in determining the date by which any action is required or permitted to be completed under this chapter. The IRS/DOL guidance states that subject to the statutory duration limitation in ERISA section 518 and Code Section 7508A, all group health plans, disability plans and other employee welfare benefit plans, and employee pension benefit plans subject to ERISA or the Code must disregard the period between March 1, 2020 until sixty (60) days after the announced end of the National Emergency or such other date announced by the Agencies in a future notice (the “Outbreak Period”). What this means (or meant) is that with the March 1 start date in 2020, the period of one-year period defined in ERISA and the Code ends on February 28, 2021, which, unless further extended by an agency extension, emergency order or other, means that the outbreak period should end on February 28, 2021. This means that anyone pending COBRA elections and premium payments would be asked to pay up.

THEN
Because I heard so little talk about this in the industry, I asked two attorneys to tell me their thoughts on the ending of the outbreak period (again, this was prior to Notice 2021-01 – so THEN). In a recent conversation with John Hickman, attorney from Alston & Bird in Atlanta, John responded, “While generally not well known, and absent further agency action, the Outbreak Period tolling should expire by statute, on February 28, 2021. This means that any affected tolled periods (COBRA election period or premium payment period or claims submission period) will begin to run again, with any previously tolled periods tacked onto the end. The ‘Outbreak Period’ is kind of like groundhog day. You wake up on March 1, 2021 and all tolled periods start to run again.”

Marilyn Monahan of Monahan Law office felt the same. In a recent podcast we discussed this topic, where Marilyn stated “…the duration of the outbreak period would be subject to a one-year limitation that’s contained in Section 518 of ERISA… That being the case, based on a strict reading of the regulations, the outbreak period should end on February 28, 2021.” Marilyn continued, “However, events are changing rapidly these days in Washington, so keep your eye out for the government as to whether this period might be extended.”

I asked John Hickman if the federal agencies would or could extend this Outbreak Period, or could the new Biden Administration extend it by Executive Order? Is this something Congress can do? John responded: “Congress most certainly could extend the Outbreak Period, but it would take a hastily enacted law. The agencies are also currently considering their options. We understand that, at least one of the tri-agencies believes that they are constrained by the 12-month period, because it is used for other statutory requirements as well.  They will need to get creative to find a way to extend the relief.”

As a former TPA executive, I have to think of the administrative considerations of the end of the Outbreak Period. I asked John Hickman if he felt that health plans or their COBRA Administrators need to send notices to participants and COBRA qualified beneficiaries? “Much of the Notice obligation will depend on the approach taken with regard to the Outbreak Period – was coverage continued (unlikely) or merely made available if an election/payment was made (generally the case). Look at what was communicated previously and determine what should be communicated now. Back in mid-2020 neither the agencies nor TPAs considered the Outbreak Period continuing for a full 12 months. Under current COBRA law, some Notices will most likely be required – coverage termination notices, premium contribution notices, etc. because situations vary based on past notices and practices, TPAs should seek the advice of counsel on these issues.”

How does the end of the Outbreak Period impact Health FSA run out periods? Can plans voluntarily extend it? John Hickman had this response: “In most cases the runout period for 2019 and 2020 plan years will resume (along with any tolled days) as of March 1st. This means that the FSA TPA may have 3 separate years against which to process claims – 2019-2021.”

NOW

So here is where it gets crazy!   Now we move on to the NOW…  On February 26, 2021, the DOL issued Notice 2021-01, which offered their very important and much needed interpretation of prior guidance.  Under the new notice, the one-year limitation discussed above provides the ability to extend the deadlines through regulatory action to basically apply on an individual-by-individual basis!  In the notice, the DOL interprets the Tolling Period to end the earlier of one year from the date the deadline would have begun running for that individual or 60 days from the end of the National Emergency.  As we all know, the national emergency has not yet ended.

Let’s dig into this a bit further…  What this means is that every person has his or her own “tolling period.”  So, the extension begins on the date that the clock would have started for a particular deadline, on a rolling basis.

The DOL provided examples to illustrate the duration of the relief under the notices:

If a qualified beneficiary (QB) would have been required to make a COBRA election by March 1, 2020, the Notice delays requirement until February 28, 2021, which is the earlier of 1 year from March 1, 2020 or the end of the outbreak period (still ongoing).  Similarly, if a QB would have been required to make a COBRA election by March 1, 2021, the notice delays that election requirement until the earlier of 1 year from that date (i.e. March 1, 2022), or the end of the outbreak period.  Likewise, if a plan would have been required to furnish a notice or disclosure by March 1, 2020, the relief under the Notices would end with respect to that notice or disclosure on February 28, 2021.  The responsible fiduciary would be required to ensure that the notice or disclosure was furnished on or before March 1 2021.  In all of these examples, the delay for actions required or permitted that is provided by the Notices does not exceed 1 year.

So what does all this mean for your TPAs, insurers or others when administering all of this?  Think about it.  They literally only had 2 days’ notice (expected end date was Feb. 28 and the notice was released on Feb. 26, 2021)… So it’s highly unlikely that they would have had time to do necessary programming to accommodate these changes!  They will literally have to create custom COBRA, special enrollment and claims deadlines on a person-by-person basis.

The DOL stated in the Notice that plan administrators or other fiduciaries “should consider affirmatively sending a notice regarding the end of the relief period.”  In addition, they stated, “plan disclosures issued prior to or during the pandemic may need to be reissued or amended if such disclosures failed to provide accurate information regarding time in which participants and beneficiaries were required to take action, e.g. COBRA election notices and claims procedure notices.”  They also encouraged plans to ensure that participants and beneficiaries losing coverage are made aware of other coverage options, such as marketplace coverage.

Marilyn Monahan was kind enough to give me an updated comment on these changes“The new guidance will complicate plan administration, particularly with regard to COBRA, but also with regard to claims processing for medical benefits and health FSAs.  Good record keeping, and working closely with your TPA and COBRA administrator, will be essential.”

Regarding the notices, Marilyn commented: “Implementing the new guidance will have to start with creating and distributing any necessary notices to explain when the Outbreak Period will end and participants will have to act.” 

I’m guessing a lot of extensions will need to be made, which is going to make this a very confusing, very difficult process, so stay tuned!

The New Stimulus Bill Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 (CAA)

The new CAA is extensive, with HR 133 containing 2,124 pages of bill text alone. The entire Act is 5,593 pages in length. For the purposes of this article, I will focus only on the employer plan sponsor and benefits perspective. Keep in mind, at this point we only have bill text… so we have the “what” but until we have regulations and guidance, we do not have the “how.” I’m sure some of the “how” will be released in the next few months.

CAA Provisions to Extend FFCRA – Optional

First, CAA has some provisions to extend provisions of the FFCRA related to paid leaves. As mentioned above, the two paid leave provisions in the FFCRA expired as of December 31, 2020, which means that employees no longer have a right to paid leave and employers are no longer obligated to provide such leave in the event of a COVID-19 diagnosis. The CAA, however, gives employers the option to provide paid sick leave and receive a tax credit through March 31, 2021, under the terms and conditions set forth in the FFCRA. Note that this provision does not include any additional sick days. In short, employers have the choice of paying the applicable mandatory paid sick and family leave through December 31, 2020, as previously required by FFCRA, or they may extend payment eligibility through March 31, 2021, subject to all other obligations under FFCRA. This also applies to self-employed individuals. If employers should elect to extend the FFCRA paid sick leave provisions through March 31, 2021, they could then also extend the business tax credits for emergency paid sick leave or expanded family medical leave through March 31, 2021 (this would have otherwise ended on December 31, 2020).

I would like to add as a personal comment that although CAA offers the option to continue the FFCRA leaves, employers should not feel obligated to. Let’s face it; many employers had a terrible financial year in 2020 due to COVID-19 shutdowns, etc., and although they will get a tax credit for continuation of 2021 leaves through March, they would still have to put the money out first, and many just simply can’t afford that.

For self-employed individuals, they may now elect to use earnings from the prior taxable year rather than the current taxable year for emergency paid sick leave or expanded family medical leave.

CAA Provisions for Cafeteria Plan Changes FSAs and DCAPS- Summary

The CAA provides for temporary relief for Health FSAs and Dependent Care Accounts, which allow participants to carryover any unused FSA funds from plan years ending in 2020 or 2021. Prior to this provision, DCAPs could not have a carry-over feature, and FSA accounts had a $550 limit. In essence, Health FSA and DCAP balances that are unused in 2020 may be carried over into 2021, and unused balances in 2021 may be carried over into 2022. This came about because people put off surgeries, overestimated dependent care amounts, etc. due to COVID-19. Note that the temporary relief provisions can be found in Pub. L. No. 116-260, Div. EE Section 214 (2020). You should also review 2020 relief under IRS Notice 2020-29.

Grace periods were also extended in the CAA for FSAs and DCAPs. Prior to the CAA, grace periods could extend for 2 1/2 months. Under CAA, for plan years ending in 2020 or 2021, the plan may extend their grace period to 12 months after the end of the plan year. Keep in mind, these selections are optional, and you should adopt Plan Amendments for all applicable CAA selections. The Relief Act does not address whether the extended grace period can be limited by plan design in amount or duration. Grace period guidance pre-COVID allowed plan sponsors to limit their carryovers to a specified amount (such as no more than $1,500, or no more than $2,000). The 12-month extension for grace period appears to be flexible, and employers may be able to adopt an extension less than the 12-month allowance (please consult with your legal counsel).

FSAs can have a carryover or grace period, but not both. Your carryover or grace periods can impact HSA eligibility in the following year.

Another important provision is that ongoing grace period coverage in a general-purpose health FSA would make an individual ineligible for an HSA for the entire period of coverage. This also applies to the carryover.

Health FSAs have post-termination reimbursement provisions under CAA. If an employee who terminates participation in a health FSA during the 2020 or 2021 calendar year, the individual may continue to receive reimbursements from unused FSA account balances through the end of the plan year, including any grace periods.

In the CAA, the DCAP plan may change the age of a “qualified individual” for DCAP reimbursement purposes. For dependents who have aged out of eligibility during the COVID-19 pandemic, plans may extend the maximum age limit to age 14 (previously it was age 13). This applies during the last plan year with a regular enrollment period ending on or before January 31, 2020. The same relief applies for the next plan year, but only for unused grace period amounts from the 2020 plan year or other amounts carried over into the 2021 plan year.

In my recent conversation with Mr. Hickman, we discussed the extent of provisions on FSA relief, carryover, post termination FSA spend-downs, expansions of eligible DCAP from age 12 to 13, as well as election changes in plan years ending in 2021 under the CAA. He recently discussed “Points to Ponder” in a recent update he did on the CAA. I asked if he would share with us his thoughts on whether Amendments should be adopted, timing considerations and TPA capabilities? “Sure,”, stated John. “While the relief can be important in cases where 2020 FSA amounts remain unused, many employers have already incorporated the May 2020 IRS FSA relief and allowed an extended grace period for years ending in 2020, and for 2020 elections. So, whether the enhanced grace period/carryover relief is appealing to an employer will very much depend on whether unused amounts will still remain after any ‘normal’ or ‘2020 extended’ grace period or carryover. Also, employers with HSA programs and HDHPs should take extreme care in coordinating their HSA eligibility with any enhanced grace period or carryover.”

Student Loan Repayment Extension

The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) allows for employers to set up an educational assistance program under section 127 of the Code. Prior to the CARES Act, this program could only be used for tuition reimbursement. The CARES Act allowed employers to also reimburse for student loan debt, but that provision has since expired (as of January 1, 2021).

The CAA extends the CARES Act tuition assistance program change through December 31, 2025. The maximum is $5,250 for both tuition and student loan repayment, allows the employer to contribute up to the $5,250 on student loans on a tax-free basis, and such payment would be excluded from the employee’s income. This change has captured the interest of tech companies and other companies; particularly those that tend to hire engineers or other tech positions straight out of college. Some of these companies may not be able to compete with other firms on salary, but offering to reimburse for student loan debt could help in their recruiting efforts.

This provision applies to any student loan payments made by an employer on behalf of the employee after the date of enactment and before January 1, 2026.

In order for an employer to use this provision, keep in mind, they must first set up a written Section 127 Plan Document and follow the applicable rules established by the IRC.

Surprise Billing

Surprise billing in the No Surprises Act, which was part of the CAA, seeks to protect patients from surprise medical bills in situations where patients have little or no control over who provides their care, including non-emergency services provided by out-of-network (OON) providers and in-network facilities, emergency services provided by OON providers, and facilities, and air ambulance services. Surprise billing practices are commonly known to undermine the control and affordability of a health plan, take advantage of people when they are the most vulnerable, and jeopardizes the overall satisfaction of the employer sponsored health plan. In these circumstances, plan participants/patients should not be penalized for the services that were provided outside of their control, such as an ER physician, an anesthesiologist, or lab work that could not be completed in a PPO lab and was sent elsewhere. Previously we had the No Surprises Act of 2019, and 17 states now have passed laws on balance billing. The applicability is for plan years on or after January 1, 2022, for group health plans and group health insurers. It applies to grandfathered and non-grandfathered health plans, but does not apply to excepted benefits or retiree health plans.

The No Surprises Act mandates that in-network cost sharing applies to out-of-network services in the following circumstances:

  • Emergency services at a hospital emergency department (ED)/freestanding ED*
  • Ancillary services provided by an out-of-network provider at an in-network facility*
  • Non-emergency services performed by an out-of-network provider in a in-network facility (exceptions apply if provider provides notice and individual consents to using an out-of-network provider, or not applicable to ancillary services or services arising from unforeseen, urgent medical needs)*
  • Cost sharing counted as if in-network
  • In-network coinsurance is based on the “recognized amount”
  • Providers may not balance bill the amount in excess of the in-network cost sharing for the services listed above

Under this Act, “certain services*” includes emergency medicine, anesthesiologist, pathology, radiology, neonatology, assistant surgeon, hospitals, intensivisits, diagnostic services (x-ray/lab) services for which there is no in-network provider available, and other services as directed by the Secretary.

The No Surprises Act requires plans to make an initial payment or make an initial denial within 30 days; the provider or health plan must open negotiations regarding any cost dispute within the 30 days of receiving an initial payment or denial. If negotiations fail, a 30-day cooling off period happens, followed by a “baseball-style” independent arbitration, where each side submits a payment offer and the arbitrator chooses which side is acceptable.

In the event of an air ambulance service, similar rules will apply (not applicable to ground ambulances). The air ambulance must report to HHS/DOT, and plans must report to DOL/HHS/IRS.

The No Surprises Act requires advance EOB disclosures. Upon receiving notice from a provider or facility of scheduled services or a request form a participant or beneficiary, the plan must notify the participant or beneficiary within the applicable timeframe, and provide the following information:

  • Whether the provider/facility is in-network or OON
  • A good-faith cost estimate of the amount the plan will pay and the amount of the individual’s cost-sharing
  • A good faith estimate of the amounts the individual has incurred towards financial limitations such as deductibles and out-of-pocket accumulations
  • A disclaimer if a medical management technique is applied
  • A disclaimer that this is just an estimate
  • Other pertinent or relevant information

Consumer Protection Provisions in the No Surprises Act include transparency for all patients, consistent with the Transparency in Coverage Rules, which I discussed in detail in a previous article.

In general, the consumer protection provisions include transparency for in-network and out-of-network provisions and out-of-pocket provisions, the maintenance of a price comparison tool (see my prior Transparency in Coverage article for details), provider directory information (web-based), and disclosure of billing protections within your state.

Broker/Agent Compensation Disclosure

The CAA also includes significant broker compensation disclosure requirements, effective one year from enactment, or December 27, 2021. This disclosure provision modifies ERISA to add a disclosure requirement of both direct or indirect compensation by brokers or consultants, if they enter into a contract or arrangement with a group health plan, or reasonably expect broker services or consulting compensation to equal $1,000 or more per year (group health plan insurance commissions would likely count toward the $1,000 threshold in all cases). Compensation includes anything of monetary value, but does not include non-monetary compensation valued at $250 or less, in aggregate, during the contract term. The broker and consultant disclosure requirements include health plans, which would include excepted benefits like stand-alone dental and vision, health FSAs, EAPs, and HRAs.

Disclosure is required under Section 408(b)(2) of ERISA and is very similar to retirement plan disclosures that have been required since 2012.

In summary, the broker/consultant must provide in advance of the contract date to the employer/plan sponsor all expected compensation, and communicate any changes no later than 60 days from the date the broker is aware of the change, or upon written request. Brokers/consultants will be required to provide a disclosure notice to each client.

Content of Disclosure

In general, the CAA Broker compensation disclosure notice must include:

  • A description of services (what are you doing for your client?)
  • A statement indicating if the broker/consultant plans to offer fiduciary services to the plan, if applicable (yes or no – in most cases, this should be NO for most brokers)
  • All direct compensation, in the aggregate, or by service
  • All indirect compensation, including vendor incentive payments, a description of the arrangement under with the compensation is paid, the payer name, and any services for which compensation will be received
  • Any transactional-based compensation, for example, commissions, finder’s fees for services and the payers and recipients of the compensation
  • A description of any compensation expected with regard to the contract’s termination

Note that bonuses and overrides, etc. were not clearly specified in the bill text. The coming regulations/rules/guidance should give us more clarity on this.

Services Included

 

In general, the services you provide to your clients must be included in your disclosure notice. Examples of services include, but are not limited to:

  • Development or implementation of plan design, insurance or insurance selection
  • Recordkeeping services
  • Medical Management vendor
  • Benefits Administration (including dental and vision)*
  • Stop-loss insurance placement or recommendations
  • PBM services
  • Wellness program services
  • Transparency tools and vendors
  • Group purchasing organization preferred vendor panels
  • Disease management vendors or products
  • Compliance services
  • EAP Programs
  • Third Party Administration (TPA) services *

Consulting services are nearly identical to the brokerage services, but no not need to involve the actual broker services. At this time, it is unclear whether “consulting” just involves brokers serving in a consulting capacity (for example, consulting for a self-insured employer in a self-funded health plan), or other service providers who “consult” such as TPA consulting on plan design or implementation. We assume that further guidance will be coming soon.

I’d like to point out that in many states, including California, administration services (indicated by the asterisks above) require a license, and in many cases, providing administrative services that would be covered under that license as a broker could be considered prohibited transactions under ERISA (but that is a topic for another article on another day). I also wanted to mention that in California, the Department of Insurance issued a bulletin some time ago that basically states that for insured products, if you’re getting a commission, you cannot also take a fee, unless you are doing other services. So please check with your legal counsel to determine what you can and cannot charge fees for (self-funded plans with ERISA jurisdiction are separate and fees and stop loss commissions are acceptable and common).

Direct compensation is defined as compensation from the plan itself, through plan assets. Amounts paid by the plan sponsor/employer would not be considered plan assets, but participant contributions, keep in mind, are always plan assets.

Indirect compensation is generally amounts received from anyone other than the plan or the employer/plan sponsor. For example, if a consultant receives compensation from an insurance carrier, an industry vendor, or TPA not in the form of commissions.

I know that many brokers are in panic mode about these disclosure requirements. I, however, welcome them. I guess that is because I have worked in the ERISA world for all of my career, where disclosure is already required in most cases (particularly over 100 lives). I believe that this disclosure requirement is actually a way to show your value as a broker and consultant. If you provide fewer services than many other brokers, this could alarm you, but if you are providing a number of services for your clients, this should be a way to prove your worth to your clients.

I would recommend that brokers/consultants begin now to identify all group health plans where broker or consulting services are provided, to determine all sources of direct and indirect compensation, and determine all compensation that meets the $1,000 threshold. Then, you should begin to design your disclosure notice and determine the best way to produce this to your clients. For most, particularly large agencies, this would be easier if automated, so that timely disclosures can be provided at the end of the year.

Transparency

There are four significant provisions of Division BB of the CAA, Gag Clauses (effective January 1, 2021), Compensation Disclosure (effective December 27, 2021), Mental Health Parity (effective February 10, 2021, and Pharmacy Benefit & Drug Cost Reporting (effective December 27, 2021). The gag clause section states that health plans may not enter into an agreement with a provider, TPA or other service provider that would restrict the plan (directly or indirectly) from providing provider-specific cost or quality of care information or data, electronically accessing de-identified claims and encounter information, and sharing such information with a business associate. I discussed the compensation disclosure in the broker disclosure section. The Mental Health Parity section states that group and individual plans that provide medical and surgical benefits and mental health/substance abuse benefits must perform and document comparative analysis. The pharmacy benefit section requires plans to disclose the cost of commonly prescribed medications annually. These are only simple explanations of the transparency requirements in the CAA.

Unemployment Provisions

The CAA includes an extension and phase-out of unemployment benefits, including extending benefits to current recipients with benefits remaining to March 14, 2021, including relief for governmental entities and nonprofit organizations.

The CAA provisions limit unemployment assistance to any week prior to April 5, 2021, and increases the number of weeks from 39 to 50. In addition, it adds additional unemployment funding of $300 per week for weeks of unemployment beginning on or after December 26, 2020, and ending before March 14, 2021.

Grandfathered Health Plans Final Rules

On December 11, 2020, the US Departments of Labor, Health & Human Services, and Treasury released the final rule for Grandfathered Health Plans. The final rule amends the requirements for grandfathered group health plans and grandfathered group health insurance coverage to preserve their grandfathered status.

The final rule provides greater flexibility to increase cost-sharing amounts without loss of grandfather status; for example, you could increase the deductible of a HDHP to comply with HSA limits, or you could use a new standard for calculating increases in co-pays. The final rule applies to plan changes that are effective on/after 6/15/21

Grandfathered plans are subject to the ACA’s requirements, such as the prohibition on pre-existing conditions and prohibitions on waiting periods that exceed 90 days, the prohibition on lifetime or annual dollar limits, the prohibition on recissions, and the requirement for plans that offer dependent coverage of children do so up to the age of 26, but grandfathered plans are exempt from certain other requirements.

The final rule clarifies that grandfathered group health plans that are High Deductible Health Plans (HDHP) may increase fixed-dollar amount cost sharing requirements, such as deductibles, to the extent necessary to maintain its status as a HDHP, without losing grandfathered status.

The final rule provides for an alternate method of measuring permitted increases in fixed-amount cost-sharing that allows plans and issuers to better account for changes in the costs of health coverage over time.

Provisions in the 2015 final rules specify circumstances which changes to terms will cause the plans to cease to be a grandfathered plan, including the elimination of all or substantially all benefits to diagnose or treat a particular condition; any increase in a % cost-sharing requirement (such as co-insurance), any increase in a fixed-amount cost-sharing requirement (other than a co-payment), such as a deductible or OOP Maximum that exceeds certain thresholds, any increase in a fixed-amount co-payment that exceeds certain thresholds, a decrease in contribution rate toward the cost of coverage of any tier of coverage for any class of similarly situated individuals by more than 5%, and the imposition of annual limits on the dollar value of all benefits for group health plans and insurance coverage that did not impose such a limit prior to March 23, 2010.

High Deductible Health Plan Changes: The 2020 final rules include amendments to the 2015 Final Rules for High Deductible Health Plan limits, including: an increase to fixed-amount cost-sharing requirements effective on/after 6/15/21 will not cause the plan to relinquish its grandfather status—but only to the extent such increases are necessary to maintain its status as an HDHP under IRC section 223.

  • IRS Example: A grandfathered HDHP had a $2,400 deductible for family coverage on 3/23/10. The plan is amended after 6/15/21 to increase the deductible limit by the amount that is necessary to comply with the requirements for a plan to qualify as an HDHP under section 223(c)(2)(A). This change exceeds the maximum percentage increase under the Grandfathered regulations.

IRS Conclusion: The increase in the deductible at that time does not cause the plan to cease to be a grandfathered health plan because the increase was necessary for the plan to continue to satisfy the definition of an HDHP under section 223(c)(2)(A).

An important note related to this provision: The annual cost-of-living adjustment to the required minimum deductible for an HDHP has not yet exceeded the maximum percentage increase that would cause an HDHP to lose grandfather status—but it may in the future, causing participants to lose HSA eligibility—and that is the reason for the change in the regulations.

Amendments to the 2015 Final Rules:

There was a new definition of maximum percentage increase provided in the final rules, which allowed for a new Fixed Amount Cost-Sharing provision. Under the 2015 rules, there is a formula for plans use to determine if the fixed cost-sharing amount exceeds certain limits; if the plan exceeds the limits, the plan uses  status. The formula relies on the “maximum percentage increase.” Under the 2015 rules, the maximum percentage increase is medical inflation from 3/23/10 (tied to CPI-U) plus 15 percentage points. Under the new rules, on or after 6/15/21, the maximum percentage increase is the greater of (a) the current standard or (b) the change in the premium adjustment percentage plus 15 percentage points. So why the change? In essence, according to Marilyn Monahan, the alternative standard is considered a better reflection of the cost of group coverage.

In other amendments to the 2015 Final Rule, a new Definition of Maximum Percentage Increase was defined. To best describe the new definition of maximum percentage increase, I’m going to use two of the examples from the regulations, and the analysis done by my benefits attorney, Marilyn Monahan of Monahan Law Office (with her permission) in a recent webinar we did jointly, which was modified slightly for educational purposes.

  • Example 4. On 3/23/10, a grandfathered plan charges a copayment of $30 per office visit for specialists; this is later increased to $40. The plan subsequently increases the $40 copayment requirement to $45 for a later plan year, effective before 6/15/21. Within the 12-month period before the $45 copayment takes effect, the greatest value of the overall medical care component of the CPI–U (unadjusted) is 485.

Conclusion. The increase in the copayment from $30 to $45, expressed as a percentage, is 50% (45 – 30 = 15; 15 ÷ 30 = 0.5; 0.5 = 50%). Medical inflation from March 2010 is 0.2527 (485 – 387.142 = 97.858; 97.858 ÷ 387.142 = 0.2527). The increase that would cause a plan to cease to be a grandfathered health plan is the greater of the maximum percentage increase of 40.27% (0.2527 = 25.27%; 25.27% + 15% = 40.27%), or $6.26 (5 × 0.2527 = $1.26; $1.26 + $5 = $6.26). Because 50% exceeds 40.27% and $15 exceeds $6.26, the change in the copayment at that time causes  the plan to cease to be a GR health plan.

  • Example 5. Same facts as Example 4, except the grandfathered group health plan increases the copayment to $45, effective after 6/15/21. The greatest value of the overall medical care component of the CPI–U (unadjusted) in the preceding 12-month period is still 485. In the calendar year that includes the effective date of the increase, the applicable portion of the premium adjustment percentage is 36%.

Conclusion. In this Example 5, the grandfathered health plan may increase the copayment by the greater of: Medical inflation, expressed as a percentage, plus 15 percentage points; or the applicable portion of the premium adjustment percentage for the calendar year that includes the effective date of the increase, plus 15 percentage points. The latter amount is greater because it results in a 51% maximum percentage increase (36% + 15% = 51%) and, as demonstrated in Example 4, determining the maximum percentage increase using medical inflation yields a result of 40.27%. The increase in the copayment, expressed as a percentage, is 50% (45 – 30 = 15; 15 ÷ 30 = 0.5; 0.5 = 50%). Because the 50% increase in the copayment is less than the 51% maximum percentage increase, the change in the copayment requirement at that time does not cause the  plan to cease to be a grandfathered health plan.

Note: The percentages used are hypotheticals.

I’ve obviously shared with you a lot of information, which may take you a bit of time to absorb. The best thing I can tell you is to stay tuned, because the way things are changing, this could all be modified in the coming weeks and months, as new rules, technical releases, guidance and FAQs are released. Until then, to everyone out there, stay safe and stay healthy!

Dorothy Cociu is the Vice President, Communications, for the California Association of Health Underwriters, and the President of her own insurance agency and consulting firm, Advanced Benefit Consulting & Insurance Services. 

 

Author’s Note & Disclaimer: I’d like to thank attorneys Marilyn Monahan of Monahan Law Office and John Hickman of Alston & Bird for their assistance with this article. For more information on this topic, please refer to The STATEment Compliance Corner, Legal Brief, March-April, 2021, where Marilyn discusses some of these issues. The information contained in this article is informational only and should not be construed as legal advice. We always recommend that you work with your legal counsel as situations vary.

Reference Sources: Webinar content and research, Dorothy Cociu & Marilyn Monahan, Federal Legislative & Regulatory Updates, Winter, 2021 (January 26, 2021), Benefits Executive Roundtable Podcast, S2 E 16 & 17 with Host Dorothy Cociu & guest Marilyn Monahan, FFCRA & CARES Act regulations text, rules, notices, FAQs, technical releases from the DOL, HHS & IRS; Consolidated Appropriations Act 2021; ERISA section 518, Code Section 7507A, Webinars from NAHU Compliance Corner, Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021- An Employer & Benefits Perspective; Webinar Slides from Alston & Bird, Health & Welfare Plan Lunch Group, February 4, 2021. Updated reference:  US Department of Labor, EBSA Disaster Relief Notice 2021-01, Guidance on Continuation of Relief for Employee Benefit Plans and Plan Participants and Beneficiaries Due to the COVID-19 Outbreak.  ##

S2E16 – Legislative & Regulatory Updates Winter 2021 Part 1

Legislative updates 2021 podcast

In part one of a two-part podcast, host Dorothy Cociu and Marilyn Monahan of Monahan Law office discuss important updates for employer plan sponsors.  In Part 1 – Dorothy and Marilyn will discuss What the Future May Hold in Washington; COVID-19 updates, including an important update on the Outbreak Period that applies to COBRA and other timeframe extensions; the New CAA Stimulus Bill and How it Impacts Other Laws & Regulations; CAA Important Provisions including the No Surprises Act, which puts limits on balance billing; the new reporting period for Mental Health Parity; and Agent/Broker Compensation Disclosure.

Important Notice/Disclaimer:  This podcast includes excerpts from an educational webinar instructed by Dorothy and Marilyn in January, 2021.  Be advised that some provisions discussed in this podcast are subject to change, as the environment in Washington and Sacramento are moving quickly.  Since this podcast was recorded, certain items discussed have already been changed, and we expect this to continue, so stay tuned for more updates!

S2E15 – Human Resources & Employment Updates, Including COVID Workplace Assistance & HR Certifications with Jacquelyn Thorp, MSHR, SPHR, PHRCA

Host Dorothy Cociu interviews Jacquelyn Thorp, CEO and Founder of Train Me Today, a California-based Human Resources Consulting and HR Training Organization.  Jackie discusses the complexity of COVID-19 workplace applications, policies and procedures, and how to get people back to work safely.  We discuss the most important things CEOs and CFOs need to know about the role of HR in this complex environment, as well as how to best get and keep HR professionals up to date with certifications.  What works best for small employers, large employers, and everything in-between?  We also discuss some new laws and changes to existing laws in California, including CAL/OSHA COVID regulations, SB 1159 Work Comp requirements, California Family Rights Act changes, minimum wage updates and more.  Join us for this informative podcast!

Benefits Executive Roundtable Season 2 Episode 15

Employers

 

Get COVID-19 Training and Presentation for Your Employees